new york times magazine miranda cosgrove

new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. new york times magazine
  • new york times magazine



  • s8film40
    Apr 5, 01:12 PM
    I can understand Apple's concern here it could give the impression to an uneducated user that it is OK to jailbreak their phone since they are being encouraged to by what would seem like a legitimate source. I don't think it's much of an issue for Scion owners though as they are probably used to sub-par performance.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove wants to go
  • Miranda Cosgrove wants to go



  • KnightWRX
    May 6, 07:33 AM
    What I really wanted to say is that Google is going to run their datacentres on ARM

    There you go again with facts. Citation needed. I think what you want to say here is :

    "There was some speculation last year that Google might switch to ARM for their datacenters and servers after an acquisition of an ARM technology company".

    There is no way you can state what you are stating as a fact right now. ;)

    But the fact that Google bought a company developing ARM processors and also hired engineers from PA Semi that previously worked on Apple's A4 chips

    Yes, that is a fact you can state.

    means that they ARE going to produce their own ARM chips

    Not all acquisitions end up in workable projects. Google does a lot of acquisitions, some of them just end up as IP port-folio fodders, some of them get recycled into products, some of them just get abandonned. Who knows what Google is planning ?

    either for their own Android phones or more likely for their datacentres.

    How is it more likely for their datacenters, in light of Google's staff saying ARM isn't ready for the datacenter ? I'd say at this point, it's more likely for the Chrome OS based netbooks that will probably never see the light of day officially beyond the Cr48.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove
  • Miranda Cosgrove



  • Schizoid
    Mar 31, 08:51 AM
    By separating Server from Lion client, I believe Apple will now pursue the Microsoft line of OS marketing...

    We'll have Lion Home Premium (no Server) plus Lion Professional (with Server) and also you can buy Lion Ultimate (32 or 64 bit with or without Server and a new disk encryption facility)

    Users of Snow Leopard will be able to upgrade to Lion Home Premium and/or Lion Profession without moving data, unless the data needs to be encrypted by copying to a Lion Ultimate (32 bit only edition) via the 64 bit Lion Home Premium or Professional without passwords and/or data...

    Microsoft - Making things Simple�





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove was spotted
  • Miranda Cosgrove was spotted



  • Mac'nCheese
    Apr 9, 09:39 PM
    So if the parentheses are solved first why not just put them in front? Why go through all the semantics? Do scientists purposely make it this hard when solving equations?

    So people can learn how to do math properly. If teachers quized students with the "easy" version of questions, they would never really learn anything but the basics. The harder something is to do, the more you learn how to reason, how to think, how to work through problems and solve them. It's like asking why kids learn more and more vocabulary words when, in the end, they probably will just use the most common ones.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove performs on
  • Miranda Cosgrove performs on



  • Tailpike1153
    Apr 21, 02:46 PM
    I hope they call it the MacServe :D

    :). I like the name. Alot better than iServe.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove was in New
  • Miranda Cosgrove was in New



  • mikemac11
    Mar 30, 07:47 PM
    Mac rumors please stop listening to TechCrunch.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove has been
  • Miranda Cosgrove has been



  • res1233
    May 6, 05:37 AM
    WOW.

    First step to a totally closed system. Pretty soon all our applications we want will have to come through the App store for our Macs. The day I see that is the day I turn my Mac OFF.

    I will go back to Windows in a heart beat if I am forced to buy my applications and such through Apple.

    First off, why do you care where you get your apps from? Second, I highly doubt Apple is going to make Mac OS as closed as iOS. It just makes no sense. They would have to redesign too much of the OS to make it that closed, and they'd have to take away so many features that it wouldn't be the same OS anymore. I doubt Apple is stupid enough to do that. It's true that Apple wants to have as much control over the entire process as they can get, but I firmly believe that there are limits to it. They wont sabotage their own OS because I don't think i've ever met anyone clueless enough to think that that would be a good idea.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. new york times magazine
  • new york times magazine



  • Little Endian
    May 9, 10:25 AM
    I don't know about completely free and with all the same features available now. Free would probably bog mobile me down to a joke status and even now I would hardly call mobile me performance stellar. Perhaps tiered pricing and plans would be more suitable.

    However I believe Apple could and should lower the price. I have been using Mobile Me since itools and have been paying the $100 a year Apple tax for the past 5+ years. Well sort of... The first year year hooked me in at $49 and I got another couple years on discounted terms. The progression of itools>.mac>mobile me has seem many improvements and added features, but really come on!! $100 a year for services that you could get for free or half off is pretty steep, sure the integration and seamlessness is nice but its far from perfect.

    I have actually been planing to cancel my mobile me plan for the last two years but both times auto renew and laziness sucked me back in. All I know is that this year will most likely be my last unless Apple dramatically improves performance, adds more features, or drops the price. After all itools used to be Free and was an added benefit of using a mac.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. new york times magazine
  • new york times magazine



  • LagunaSol
    Apr 18, 05:02 PM
    WRONG.

    The LG Prada was announced in September 6 months ahead of iPhone1 announcement (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LG_Prada_%28KE850%29).

    Odd, the link you included in your argument states the Prada was "announced" on December 12, 2006.

    The iPhone was announced on January 9, less than one month later.

    And the Prada looks more like a BlackBerry than an iPhone to me. The Prada and iPhone are almost nothing alike, aside from the size and shape of the earhole.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove wants to go
  • Miranda Cosgrove wants to go



  • Molnies
    Sep 15, 04:36 PM
    I sure hope we will see Aperture 2.0 and not just 1.2...





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove put on a show
  • Miranda Cosgrove put on a show



  • 1984
    Sep 11, 01:57 PM
    What we should get:

    Movie Service with 1280x720 movies, Airport Extreme AV with composite, s-video and hdmi outputs.

    What we will get:

    Movie service with 320x240 movies, Airport Express AV with compostie and s-video only.

    :(





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove was seen out
  • Miranda Cosgrove was seen out



  • milozauckerman
    Jul 21, 11:05 PM
    Apple can't not update at least the top-end MacBooks. Dell & Co. will be putting Core 2 in comparably priced machines - $1299/1499 - as the price breaks down similarly to Core Duo chips.

    Apple doesn't want switchers going "hmmm, I can get a MacBook for <x> or a Dell with a better newer processor for the same."





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove Loves Fashion
  • Miranda Cosgrove Loves Fashion



  • dernhelm
    Aug 4, 01:41 PM
    I'm in the same boat (but upgrading from a 867MHz TiBook). I figure if there's no iMac introduced, I pull the trigger on getting a refurb iMac core duo.

    So have you purchased refurbed from Apple previously? I've never done that, but I was wondering what your experience was like.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. miranda cosgrove new york
  • miranda cosgrove new york



  • LegendKillerUK
    Mar 26, 11:44 PM
    Well it's not unprecedented. The iPad 2 shipped with iOS 4.3, which added support for the device and its new features, but not much else.

    And the original iPad came with 3.2.

    Seems to be that the iPad gets the older OS but newer processors.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. Miranda Cosgrove: An Ally
  • Miranda Cosgrove: An Ally



  • Small White Car
    May 4, 03:04 PM
    If I have to DL it from the App Store, I've got to download it 4 times!

    I can copy iPhone apps from one computer to another just fine. As long as they're logged into the same account they work.

    Shouldn't this work the same way?

    I mean, obviously we don't know, but I don't see why it shouldn't.
    So I guess we'll all just send you our AT&T Internet Bills when we go over their newly implemented data usage caps? :eek:

    :rolleyes:


    If you're using AT&T mobile internet as the primary connection for your Macs then you probably need to re-examine your life somewhat.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. new york times magazine
  • new york times magazine



  • AaronEdwards
    Apr 26, 04:52 PM
    wanna re-check that sunshine..?

    No. Why should I?





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. new york times magazine
  • new york times magazine



  • LegendKillerUK
    Mar 27, 12:19 AM
    If true...sounds like iPhone 3GS and iPad 1 owners are going to be shown the door.

    Based on history the 3GS will still be in for updates along with the iPad. Performance on the other hand...





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. miranda cosgrove new york
  • miranda cosgrove new york



  • snberk103
    May 6, 07:11 PM
    Originally Posted by snberk103
    You are entirely correct. There is really nothing that will make the daily life of an American citizen better 'cause their can of Bud is 331ml, or their corn-beef sandwich has 125gs of beef, and 12ml of mustard on two slices of rye, each 115mm thick.
    Quite frankly I really don't understand why this attitude is necessary. Have I been rude or condescending towards you in this discussion? Has anyone else in this thread?

    I think the most insulting part is that you couldn't even make a coherent point with this sarcasm. Are you trying to poke fun at random numbers in the imperial system? Arbitrary values in general? Americans who eat roast beef?

    What sarcasm? I was being quite serious. I actually and honestly agree with you that it won't make the vast majority of anyone's life easier if they use metric. I was being a little silly with the numbers, true... but it was not meant as sarcasm. I was born in the US, and was there until I was in grade 5. I moved to Canada when it was still using Imperial measures. And I mean the real Imperial, as in British Empire, not the slightly different American versions. And you are entirely correct - I coped just fine with gallons and ounces, feet and miles, etc etc. The biggest problem I had was converting from Imperial to American gallons/quarts/pints - and trying to figure out if my measuring cup was made in the Canada - i.e. true Imperial, or in the USA. And if it was made in the USA, was it calibrated in American sized units or was it calibrated for export and in true Imperial. As a photographer mixing up developers, fixers, etc, these questions were important. I swapped to metric volumes soon as I could for this reason - not because I couldn't work in ounces, etc.

    Oh you mean how you still have a queen as your sovereign? Or how you mandate bilingual education for a stark minority of French Canadians? Or how the United Kingdom still has an unwritten constitution? Or how half of Europe still has an official state church? Or how the French presume guilt rather than innocence? Or how Italy is still run by political machines?
    Guilty as charged... though we like to think being bilingual is a good and modern thing. We also have quarter of our population that hasn't signed onto our constitution (unlike the UK, we at least wrote ours down - we just don't yet have it fully ratified yet - sigh)

    Modernity is always a hindsight judgment. What should matter is if the system is not working for the people who use it. With private industries transitioning manufacturing to metric, the biggest argument in favor of the metric system is moot. The question then comes down to whether or not you are better positioned to judge what other people need or want.

    Yes, I was poking some buttons there. It's one that is sure to get most Americans into a lather, too. My point about the "claiming to be modern", is that the USA spends a lot of time telling the rest of the world how great it is...and it is in many ways, no argument. But there are some areas where the rest of world is, um, "greater." (Tongue In Cheek!) It is annoying to the rest of the world when Americans travel and think our metric signage is "quaint"... (First hand experience). I believe that, by definition, it's not our signage that is quaint. :)

    ps.... one of the defining characteristics of being Canadian is our smugness. Deserved or not, we already know it.





    new york times magazine miranda cosgrove. new york times magazine
  • new york times magazine



  • Stella
    Apr 25, 10:02 AM
    Apple could do themselves a lot of favours if they came out with an offical statement, explaining what iOS does in regards of user tracking ( i.e, location database ). Some 1 line email response fired off by SJ doesn't do much good.

    Once again, Apple fall down in terms of customer relations / communications. If Apple handled this correctly then all the fuss could go away in a couple days.





    NebulaClash
    Apr 25, 09:33 AM
    Steve needs to provide a better answer because this one makes him look like a liar.



    How so? Everything he said fits the facts as we know them. There is NO evidence that this information gets transmitted to ANYONE, and believe me people are looking hard to prove otherwise. So this makes Steve look like he's telling the truth.





    RndmAxess
    Jul 29, 10:09 PM
    deleted





    lilo777
    Apr 18, 04:02 PM
    As it's already been said, Apple is protecting their IP and patents. If they don't show the effort, they run the risk of losing them. It's not a "Apple is evil" issue, it's how IP and patents work.

    There are several ways to lose a patent. One way is not to defend it. Another ways is trying to defend bogus patents and have the court invalidate it.





    NAG
    Apr 25, 10:19 AM
    I dont know if its intentional, but your Signature link is broken, it has 1 too many h's. It begins hhttps ;)

    Neat. Guess, I did a sloppy cut and paste when I switched over from the full URL to the truncated URLs that Apple provides. It's just a lolcat, so you're not missing much.





    benpatient
    Mar 29, 01:26 PM
    I agree w/ this. Everyone has internet at home and everyone who is so into media, already has a media server. Stuff like air video and streamtome works just fine for streaming media from anywhere internet is available.

    People who care so much about accessing media enough to take their time to upload their stuff to cloud can certainly do same at their own house. Is this really for people who don't have internet at home or can't afford nas at home?

    Seriously, what is the point of all this? Only time cloud storage works is for group collaboration where people need to share things from everywhere. For personal stuff, personal computer works the best w/ decent internet.

    Not everyone has decent internet at home, you know. And those that do might not keep a computer on 24/7. I know that I'm in that situation. Leaving my MacPro on and not asleep 24/7 adds about 400-500 dollars a year to my electrical costs.

    I could get the 500GB paid amazon cloud storage account for that much!



    Total Pageviews