arnold schwarzenegger now fat

arnold schwarzenegger now fat. Arnold Schwarzenegger Now Fat
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger Now Fat



  • fivepoint
    Apr 27, 02:28 PM
    They're not. The proper file is flat. I downloaded and opened the PDF from the White House. Flat in both Illustrator and Photoshop, just one group on one layer... and no security on the PDF. No embedded fonts.

    This is a fraud.

    Uh huh- thanks again, fivepoint.

    Are you calling me a liar? I literally went to WhiteHouse.gov, opened the file in Illustrator, and moved the text around myself. :rolleyes:
    Some things never change. Laughably bias.

    Anyway, like I said, I'm sure there's an explanation... are there any graphic designers here who can help?





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER NOW FAT
  • ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER NOW FAT



  • penter
    Jul 27, 02:06 PM
    i literally let out a high pitched "aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh" when i saw this. Im really excited about it, yet so sad that i wont be able to enjoy it since i just bought my new mac a month ago (hence the "aaaahhhh")
    this summarizes my post: :) but :(





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. cracks fat as What arnold has
  • cracks fat as What arnold has



  • citizenzen
    Mar 22, 06:54 PM
    As others have pointed out, killing a peaceful protester (or non-involved innocent civilian for that matter) is never justified.

    I'm not trying to justify it.

    What I'm asking is, does it justify the action that we're taking?

    That, I'm not sold on.





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER NOW FAT
  • ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER NOW FAT



  • Digital Skunk
    Mar 22, 12:52 PM
    'nuff said (http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/22/samsung-galaxy-tab-8-9-and-new-galaxy-tab-10-1-thinner-than-the/).

    Unfortunately you're so very right. Until it's in the hand and on the shelves it's vaporware.

    And, like I've said many a times to everyone that brings this topic up:

    Apple will be king until we see some viable apps that people flock to. The iOS environment is just too good.

    Spoken from an Android fan here folks.





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER NOW FAT
  • ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER NOW FAT



  • ugp
    Jun 10, 07:21 AM
    I've always called Wal-Mart Wally World.





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. Arnold Schwarzenegger, so much
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger, so much



  • mwswami
    Jul 23, 01:03 AM
    Given the change in Clovertown schedule, I expect that at WWDC Apple will release 2 "lower end" Mac Pro configurations both with dual Woodcrests. The higher end configuration with two Clovertowns will ship early Q1 (maybe around MW'07).

    I expect it will be 2.33GHz and 2.67GHz Woodcrest models with 3.0GHz as a BTO option. Conroe in Mac Pro is looking highly unlikely.

    Anyone care to speculate on Intel's pricing for a 2.67GHz Clovertown? I am thinking $999.





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. Arnold Schwarzenegger: Kinda
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger: Kinda



  • mygoldens
    Mar 22, 06:34 PM
    It won�t sell because the iPad lines will block the view in store.

    I will probably buy one! :D

    There will not be any lines and hey, they might just have some stock!

    What a novel idea! Have stock for a product that you say you produce, WOW what a concept!





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. Now, Marvel#39;s probably going
  • Now, Marvel#39;s probably going



  • Rt&Dzine
    Feb 28, 12:58 PM
    A same-sex attracted person is living a "gay lifestyle" when he or she dates people of the same sex, "marries" people of the same sex, has same-sex sex, or does any combination of these things. I think that if same-sex attracted people are going to live together, they need to do that as though they were siblings, not as sex partners. In my opinion, they should have purely platonic, nonsexual relationships with one another.

    Heterosexual couples need to reserve sex for opposite-sex monogamous marriage. If I had a girlfriend, I might kiss her. But I wouldn't do that to deliberately arouse either of us. If either of us felt tempted to have sex with each other, the kissing would stop right away. I know of a woman who gave an excellent answer when men asked her why saved sex for marriage. She said, "I"m worth waiting for." She lived by her Catholic convictions, and she wouldn't risk letting any man use her as a mere object, as a mere "sex machine."

    Obviously most people, including Catholics, aren't able to adhere to this ideal. So are they not allowed to be married? Obviously not. And I know Catholics who have divorced and remarried. That's equally abhorrent. Yet they're allowed to do this.





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. arnold schwarzenegger now
  • arnold schwarzenegger now



  • BoyBach
    Nov 29, 06:20 AM
    My initial reservations about this story (the Zune/Universal payment) was much like eveybody's elses on these forums - very bad for us and screw 'em. But now that I've had time to think it through I actually think it's a fantastic idea.

    Fantastic for the consumer and the artist, and potentially catastrophic for Universal Music.

    Allow me to explain! Somebody buys a Zune or iPod that has had the 'Universal Tax' applied to it and then fills it with 30GB of stolen Universal music. It goes to court and the 'Pirate' successfully argues that he/she has already compensated UMG by buying the iPod/Zune. The judge agrees and piracy of Universal music becomes legal so long as it's for the 'UMG taxed' iPod or Zune. UMG collapses overnight and the artists get to release music on their terms and get more of the money that they deserve, not the faceless corporations and shareholders.

    Why is this good for us? Because every entertainment company would become very wary of labelling us all 'pirates' and might actually realise that digital distribution at a fair price is their future.


    D'oh somebody has already written something to this effect whilst I was typing!!





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER NOW FAT
  • ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER NOW FAT



  • Jimmieboy
    Aug 8, 01:45 AM
    Yahoo! Leopard looks awesome! Time machine looks like a lifesaver for me and spaces makes life so much easier. THANKS STEVE!





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. arnold schwarzenegger now and
  • arnold schwarzenegger now and



  • charlituna
    Apr 11, 10:00 PM
    This is bunk. Apple will not miss Christmas.

    Dear Steve.
    I read on macrumors.com that the new iPhone won't be ready for Christmas. What should we do.
    -- Santa.

    Dear Santa.
    Move Christmas.
    -- Steve





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. rock arnold schwarzenegger
  • rock arnold schwarzenegger



  • balamw
    Aug 7, 06:39 PM
    Norton's GoBack, which was purchased from some other company
    Yeah, I recommended GoBack to a number of users back in the day (I think it was Adaptec that owned it at one point). No-one seemed to like it at the time.

    As I and others reminisce it's a feature that has been around for well over 20 years in VMS. It's only relatively new to personal computers.

    B





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. now arnold schwarzenegger
  • now arnold schwarzenegger



  • ugp
    Jun 15, 12:49 PM
    My RS store would not let me leave information.

    They are waiting till 1pm EST.

    Meanwhile, people are twittering their stores
    are issuing pin numbers to them.

    What gives?

    Man of man, was Radio Shack the worst outfit
    to do this through. Don't totally blame them for
    being handed this crap.

    Stores were told any ticket generated before 12CST would be voided.





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. Arnold Schwarzenegger#39;s Sex
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger#39;s Sex



  • Cachiro
    Apr 6, 04:10 PM
    There is one thing some people don't see, this is one company against an entire army of companies & this one company is doing a hole lot better. Apple will alway be on top when it comes to all this type of gadget get over it people and by the way, I always thought this was Mac rumor forum.
    Maybe they should change there name :apple: :D





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. Arnold Schwarzenegger#39;s
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger#39;s



  • THX1139
    Aug 19, 07:34 PM
    ... For anyone out there who has been needlessly influenced by this guy to wait for a system that will only be outdated by the one that will come after it, please uninfluence yourself, and buy the stupid computer that you want, when you want it.

    Jeeshh!!

    I agree. I'm noticing a trend. People who are looking at the Macpro in a negative way come in three flavors. The first type are invested in G5 (especially quad) and are desperately trying justify that their investment is sound, when they actually desire a Macpro. They can feel better about their old machines by making the new ones seem bad. The are almost "smug" about waiting until a better one comes out. The second flavor are people who hate the Mac culture and are pissed that the Mac is catching up to the windows workstation sector. The third type are people who can't afford a Macpro and go out of their way to publicly discredit the machine so that they can feel good about their iMacs or Minis. There are others, but you get the point.

    I also find it amusing when I see posters participating in Macpro discussions when they have publicly stated that they have no intention of buying a Macpro. WTF?? Don't they have a life outside of macrumors? If I owned a G5 Quad and had no intention of buying a Macpro, I'd be spending all of my spare time doing cool stuff with my machine... instead of wasting that time participating in discussions that have nothing to do with me. I might read though some of the threads now and then, just to keep up with technology - but to particpate and debate, what a waste. I guess some folks have no life.





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. Arnold+schwarzenegger+now
  • Arnold+schwarzenegger+now



  • sunfast
    Aug 17, 09:07 AM
    If you buy a Xeon 5160 (3.0GHz) at the moment they are �570. Apple are charging �530 to upgrade from Xeon 5150 (2.66GHz) to the Xeon 5160. Bearing in mind that you can probably sell the original 2.66Gz chip for around �300, it would be cheaper to buy the lower spec Mac Pro and upgrade yourself.

    Forgive the � for those that think in $.

    Aren't there 2 chips though?





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. Arnold+schwarzenegger+now
  • Arnold+schwarzenegger+now



  • gugy
    Aug 11, 12:22 PM
    Seriously - unlocked phones won't float in the US. The carrier gives huge discounts and most of us don't really care about switching services (a lot people just get all their friends on the same network so all calling is free). I don't care how sweet the iPhone is. I'm not gonna pay 300-400 dollars for a phone when I can get one for 20 or less and stay with the carrier I plan to stay with anyway. Also note that I get a pretty nice company discount with the big guys on my plan and most all of my friends/family are with 1 carrier so it'd really be stupid of me to go with a diff carrier...


    I agree with you. Unfortunately the USA cell phone market is sucks.
    For me Apple has these options to make the iphone as popular as the ipod.

    � offer it to all USA carriers. GSM and CDMA
    � offer their own Apple network (hard option, because people would wait to see first if the network is reliable and wait for the end of their current carrier contracts to move to it)
    � Make it very affordable to entice people to buy it. Less than $200





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. arnold schwarzenegger no
  • arnold schwarzenegger no



  • BruinJohn
    Sep 19, 02:40 AM
    So, the shipping says 5-7 days for all the MacBooks, and 24 hours for the MBP. I think that means the MacBooks are getting refreshed next week. Either that, or the MacBooks are selling like crazy so its hard for Apple to keep up with demand. But the MBP have been out longer, and need a refresh. Just change them all Apple, and put the current models on sale. I'd love to get a white MB for around $900!





    arnold schwarzenegger now fat. arnold schwarzenegger now,
  • arnold schwarzenegger now,



  • MrNomNoms
    Apr 10, 04:08 AM
    Hoping for some better multi-core support(although probably going to have to wait for Lion for the newer QuickTime engine) and a UI that isn't from the 90's. Only thing that's changed is the scroll bars.

    In Lion they're providing AV Foundation which leads me to believe that QtKit will be a stripped down bare basic framework with AV Foundation going to be used for future heavy lifting projects. In Snow Leopard AV Foundation is provided but it is a private framework so the rumours a while ago that Lion version will be 'better' than the Snow Leopard sounds that it'll probably rely on AV Foundation in Snow Leopard but the Lion version, the one with the AV Foundation that is a public API, will probably have more features etc.





    Dr.Gargoyle
    Aug 7, 01:37 PM
    Looks like a good time to let my PM D1.25Ghz G4 retire... The new MP must be at least 10 times faster. :eek:
    Apple store up again. The old PM G5 seem to be gone.





    BornAgainMac
    Aug 17, 09:19 AM
    Won't Adobe use Core Image when the Universal Binaries come out? If both Quads had the same high powered graphics card, the benchmarks may show them to be the same with Core Image tasks.





    JGowan
    Aug 6, 06:46 PM
    I have satellite internet and have not been able to see keynote streams since getting it. Quicktime just opens up and says "Connecting" but never does.

    Is there some other source that I can expect to show the keynote (in its entirety, please)... Living in the country is a love/hate thing these days.

    Thanks.





    Dunepilot
    Nov 29, 10:45 AM
    No actually, I represent recording artists, songwriters and producers. I am on the other side usually trying to fight the labels for every nickle an artist can try to get. However, because of that, I am on the same page with them in trying to get my artists and writers compensated from a digital marketplace that only pays for a small percentage of the material transferred. My artists only get paid for between 10 - 20% of the digital material out there (the rest pirated), so, anywhere we can get some income, even if through this flawed iPod royalty, I support.

    I am just sick of people who think that they have a right to free music. Why don't you all think you have a right to free computers, or free software. How dare Apple charge you for iLife?

    If all of you on here bought all of your music either from iTunes or from a record store, then, absolutely, complain away if that dollar is passed on to you. But, which is likely in just about every case, you have a few songs you burned off a friend's CD or downloaded from a file-sharing site, then shut up, you are the reason this is necessary.

    I suspect you may be trolling, but this is the most moronic statement I've seen on a board for some time now.

    If you actually knew anything about the ethos of MacRumors and its forums, you'd know that people who post here are quite vehemently anti-piracy. What's the betting you actually work for Universal or Microsoft and are being paid to post this nonsense? Pretty likely, I'd say.

    Oh yeah - for anyone who thinks most music these days sucks, you're just looking in the wrong place. Major labels ceased to produce anything of worth quite some time ago. Dig a little deeper and there's a wealth of wonderful music being made right now (and over the last 10 years specifically).





    jaxstate
    Aug 11, 02:43 PM
    My phone just happens to work in europe, but I wouldn't care if it didn't.
    A phone that works in most of the world is better for many of us. Who wants a phone that won't work in Europe for instance?



    Total Pageviews